Some say that there are no differences between races. Other says there are differences, but no race is superior to another race. Some say the differences are only a result of culture. Others say races are different, but each race has their own thing that they are good at. I am here to tell you they are ALL WRONG! There is a strict racial hierarchy and this racial hierarchy is solely determined by genetics. Genetics determines performance across four different major categories, as listed below, and performance in these categories determine how good the race is (note that the four categories are not equally weighted).

Rank	Ethnic Bin	Aesthetics	Culture & Personality	Intelligence	Athletics	Overall
Weight		0.35	0.275	0.225	0.15
1	Europeans (from UK, to Spain, to Italy, to Slavs, to Scandinavians)	10	10	9.5	9	9.74
2	Jews (Ashkenazi Jews)	9	9.5	10	7	9.06
3	East Asians (Chinese, Japanese, Korean)	8.5	9	9.5	7.5	8.71
4	Latin Americans (e.g. Argentinians, Bolivians)	7	6	6	7	6.5
5	Africans (except North Africans)	7	5.5	4	10	6.36
6	South East Asians (e.g. Indonesians, Filipinos)	6	6.5	6.5	6	6.25
7	Middle Easterners & North Africans (e.g. Tunisians, Iraqi)	6	5	6	6	5.73
8	South Asians (e.g. Indians, Pakistanis)	2.5	4	5	4	3.70

Note that the numbers represent the median of the distribution for each category for each ethnic bin. Additionally, before all the SJWs start up with their cringey pedantry of "EthNiCiTieS DoNT eXiSt or rAcEs DoNT eXiSt" and ask me to define a particular race/ethnicity, notice I use the word "ethnic bins" and not race or ethnicity. If you don't know what an European is, for example, check yourself into a mental hospital because you are detached from reality.

Also, before people start saying aesthetics/attractive is subjective, it is not. Beauty is NOT in the eye of the beholder - it is universal and objective.

Don't agree? Share your thoughts with me by emailing me at chester.xmr@gmail.com or add me on discord at chester.pdf.